The Short Story Theories Of Ed :: essays research papers

In both of the articles, each author is trying to share his view, or theory on the in short story. The view of Edgar Allen Poe is very pessimistic toward the figment and other forms of long fiction, while B.M. Ejxenbaum takes a more analytic approach.Poe writes, The novel certainly requires what is denominated a sustained effort&8212but this is a matter of perseverance, and has but a collateral relation to talent. Is the main difference between the authors of short stories and those of novels that the novel writers are just non-talented over-achievers? Indeed, it does take talent to be able to convey a story with little or no build up, theatrical role development or falling action, but it also takes talent to do so, and the effort you put into a work, such as a novel, is your talent, and it is directly link through thought and emotional drive.Ejxenbaum uses much less opinion in his explanation of the differing styles of short fiction and those of novels. The novel is based off a history, or of travels, while the short story, which is generally more fundamental in form, is based off folklore and anecdotes. The short story mustiness be written on the home of a contradiction or contrast, and carries the weight of the story at the ending. The action of a novel falls before the ending, with a falling action following.Poe speaks of amity of effect, and how it is not appreciated or understood by the common mind, but also how it is important to the story for the central effect to gravitate toward the end. This finale must make sense with everything which came before. Ejxenbaum quote Poe several times to give insight into how Poe created his unique and famous effects and moods.Poe was a master at creating effect, in close cases one of mystery and gloom, which drove his poems and short fiction. But he also was a storyteller, and like any good storyteller, he forms plots. And with those plots, he forms his moods and effect. Ejxenbaum sums up this mentation with , The particular attention paid to the unexpected in the finale and, connected with it, a story structured on the basis of a riddle or and error which holds back the significance of the plot mainspring until the very end. The effect cannot exist without the plot, and the plot cannot exist without the effect.